Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Jan 2006 21:43 UTC
Windows In an interesting turn of events, Microsoft has said that the current Aero interface in the latest Vista build (the December CTP) is not the final UI, saying: "There are going to be GUI changes in Vista by the time the final release comes." However, not too long ago they claimed the current Aero UI was final. Will the real Microsoft developer please stand up?
Permalink for comment 90799
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: luna
by Ookaze on Mon 30th Jan 2006 10:57 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: luna"
Ookaze
Member since:
2005-11-14

Again, I think I have been misunderstood. I wasn't making a statement about whether or not windows garnished more or less attention by passerbyers, but simply that windows is immidiately recognizable (without the need to make a comment to the user, which is especially important if they are unable to, i.e. the windows machine is displayed in a movie)

But I wasn't either !!! I was telling you that people thought my Linux was Windows !!
Which just shows you that Windows is NOT recognizable.
You know, Linux desktops are easily recognised in movies and TV series too.

Besides, how do you think people became brainwashed to thinking all computers run windows?

Because they ask me how to get the same Windows everytime, despite the fact that I run Linux.

Because (mostly) all windows boxes have the same look and feel. If windows was extremely customizable then people wouldn't have that impression because when they looked at or used computers they'd always look different and your average joe would be confused about what they were using

Perhaps. But currently, Windows users are just amazed by my Linux desktop (which just looks OK to me). But when I go back to a Windows at work (that's when I can't replace it with Linux) I understand why.

People ALWAYS have a choice. No one holds a gun to your head and forces you to purchase a computer with Windows XP

In the country I live in, you'll have a VERY hard time purchasing one without Windows. And when you do (always by phone), they sell it to you for more money !!
So no one holds a gun to my head but it's not possible either. You have to build a PC yourself basically.
Only HP offered PC and laptops for cheaper without OS or with Mandriva, and it does not last long. That's why my last laptop is a Compaq/HP.

As evil as it might have been, let us not forget that MicroSoft developed a clever business strategy to create that effect

No, it was illegal from the start. And it still is, and MS is still evil, like EU showed.

Also, for your average person I don't think its much of any issue about being brainwashed or looking ignorant, as it is an issue with just not carrying what's 'under the hood' so long as it preforms the task

You got to be kidding, I converted nearly all my users to Linux because Windows never delivered, and I did not want to help MS and lose my precious time anymore.

Reply Parent Score: 1