Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 29th Jan 2006 16:06 UTC, submitted by Derek Jones
Microsoft Microsoft's C++/CLI Language Specification is an ECMA Standard (ECMA-372) and they are trying to fast track this document to be an ISO standard. The problem is that the language specified is very different from C++ and so is likely to create a great deal of confusion. Details can be found in the UK objections [.pdf], which suggest that a name distinct from C++ be used for the proposed language.
Permalink for comment 90825
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: No different than C vs C++
by load_mic on Mon 30th Jan 2006 14:41 UTC in reply to "RE: No different than C vs C++"
Member since:

I have to agree with the UK document. The changes are significant and reasons behind the changes are less than legit.

Reply Parent Score: 1