Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Feb 2006 23:54 UTC, submitted by sean batten
Permalink for comment 93744
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-06
In addition, the talk about morality is pretty sick-making. I resent being told that by running Linux I have signed up for the moral superiority club. I can't think of anything more awful.
Bringing up issues of ethics and ideology doesn't necessarily mean someone is trying to be elitist. Through our whole lives we're faced with questions of whether something is bad, neutral, good, or great. Now, I will concede that people do pull issues into the moral arena just so they can feel better than others (and this especially happens with FSF-type folks), but I don't think moral questions should be completely anathema.
Personally, I think the moral debate around intellectual property, especially software, is exciting and intriguing. In fact, this was one of the things that drew me to open-source software in the first place. And I think there's lots of room for debate: this isn't an issue that has no room for questioning like murder, theft, or rape; this is just software. So let's have fun prognosticating, and keep in mind that we may not have all the answers, so that we avoid the 'moral superiority club' mentality.