Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 14th Feb 2006 19:02 UTC
Permalink for comment 96136
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
> Anyone here realise that this is kinda pointless given
> that they're eventually going to move to SPARC V
> processors from Fujitsu?
Is the SPARC V the same as the 'UltraSparc T1 "Niagara"' mentioned in the article?
Last time I looked at Suns I think they were named UltraSPARC III, IIIx (or something), and IV.
Maybe the opening up of the specs is broader than you think? Or maybe it's just all for show. I usually just wait to hear what the kernel uber-hackers have to say about it. If they give it the thumbs up, then I'll have a look.