Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 19th Feb 2006 13:34 UTC
Permalink for comment 97478
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
What does surprise me that Intel just won't give up on the agonizing platform.
I'd say x86 is the agonizing platform, sooner or later this 30 y.o. architecture will hit the scalability and performance wall.
Plus if you want more power you can just get more CPUs and it really doesn't cost you that much more
You can't infinitely add more processors, otherwise we would be running clusters of 486s.