Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Feb 2006 12:22 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Permalink for comment 97569
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-12-21
I don't think that there is duplication of effort here. Both projects have pros and cons.
XGL seems to be a better short term solution, it works with existing drivers (including proprietary, binary-only nvidia and ati), and supports must-have extensions like XVideo and accelerated OpenGL.
Architecturaly AIGLX might be better, but only time will tell if this outweighs its current lag in other areas.
Also, Novell seems to have won the backing of NVidia, which is a clear advantage not to be ignored.