Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Feb 2006 12:22 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Permalink for comment 97691
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-14
Here it is in a nutshell:
Redhat- SAYS that the amazing effects Compiz provides COULD be done with their framework (but all they have to show for it is a Metacity that is primative in comparison). Says that the big problems with its framework today (video playing, drivers, etc.) COULD be fixed.
Novell- SHOWS what amazing effects Compiz+ XGL DOES provide today with their framework. Has SHOWN that some of the biggest problems with composite in the past (video playing, lack of being able to use the closed source ATI driver, etc) their framework can fix.
Its the difference between a possibility and a certainty. When Redhat actually SHOWS what their framework can do AT THE LEVEL of what Novell has SHOWN then I will sing a different tune. Till then Novell is pioneering the future of X while Redhat is making promises.