Having written open source software myself, and being a subscriber to mailing lists, etc, there is a realization that the number one thing missing from smaller open source projects is feedback from users.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Having been on both sides of the Open Source world--as manager of a large project and as a contributor--probably the most painful thing about Open Source software development is the negative feedback going in either direction. You only need to deal with a few salty comments from OSS project managers or a hoarde of nasty OSS project "contributors" to learn this. Go browse the Trackers on SourceForge to get a feeling for how good/bad this process can be. Some people just seem to enjoy making others feel bad. It's the fear of having this happen to yourself, whether as a contributor or as a manager, which prevents the feedback loop from working.
That's just from my own experience of having done OSS development both ways.
Having been on both sides of the Open Source world--as manager of a large project and as a contributor--probably the most painful thing about Open Source software development is the negative feedback going in either direction. You only need to deal with a few salty comments from OSS project managers or a hoarde of nasty OSS project "contributors" to learn this. Go browse the Trackers on SourceForge to get a feeling for how good/bad this process can be. Some people just seem to enjoy making others feel bad. It's the fear of having this happen to yourself, whether as a contributor or as a manager, which prevents the feedback loop from working.
That's just from my own experience of having done OSS development both ways.
Kris