Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Tue 24th Jun 2003 15:32 UTC
I was present at Apple's WWDC yesterday and witnessed one of the historical moments in Apple's history, the introduction of their 64-bit platform. Am I impressed? The answer is complicated. I was happy to see Apple moving on and deliver. But I would have expected nothing less from a 4 billion tech company who had the need to catch up with the "other" platform, the 32-bit PC. You all heard by now what's new in yesterday's press releases and news coverings. But here is a wrap up of the first day of the conference and a commentary on what Apple really announced yesterday, underneath its surrounding distortion field.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
<<<Re-read the article. Slowly.>>>
I have read your article and Apple has surpassed Wintel by a mile. The Mac software not optimized for the PPC970, running on a GHz speed up and the Windows versions are.
Quote: "Apparently, the PC they tested with, it's not the fastest P4 money can buy."
The 3.06GHz Xeon is the fastest processor from Intel. Intel's website doesn't show any 3.2GHz Xeon processors.