Linked by Nicholas Blachford on Wed 9th Jul 2003 16:43 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Another article from for the armchair computer enthusist that has no real information. Sorry, but you either need to explain more about what you are talking about or use more technical verbage to make the article a higher level. You assume that the reader knows about registers, but don't talk about IPC (using that term). Your article also makes bold claims that are unfounded and unsupported within your article or by your references.
SMT will be twice as good as HT? Where is your reference?
Also at the end of your article you predict (as many others have in the past) that Intel will hit the 'heat wall' and that the future looks bright for RISC technologies but BAD for CISC. I can't wait to see you proven wrong again as CISC technologys continue to work as well or better then RISC. For all of RISCs 'advantages' (many of which you state in this article) CISC still seems to come out on top.