Linked by Nicholas Blachford on Wed 9th Jul 2003 16:43 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



First off, HT (Hyper Threading) is a form of SMT (Simultaneous MultiThreading), so stop all this nonsense of HT vs SMT!
Second neither IBM nor DEC (with their EV8) ever claimed 100% performance increase of a SMT implementationg vs. non SMT of the same architecture.
I also have a few bones to pick with the author, since he makes a lot of false claims, for example:
"The amount of voltage the CPU can use restricts the power available and this effects the speed the clock can run at, x86 CPUs use relatively high voltages to allow higher clock rates, "
This statement is so wrong, that I do not where to begin with the nitpicking! phew...