Linked by Nicholas Blachford on Wed 9th Jul 2003 16:43 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y This article started life when I was asked to write a comparison of x86 and PowerPC CPUs for work. We produce PowerPC based systems and are often asked why we use PowerPC CPUs instead of x86 so a comparison is rather useful. While I have had an interest in CPUs for quite some time but I have never explored this issue in any detail so writing the document proved an interesting exercise. I thought my conclusions would be of interest to OSNews readers so I've done more research and written this new, rather more detailed article. This article is concerned with the technical differences between the families not the market differences.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Earth Resources & Microsoft wisen up.
by John Blink on Thu 10th Jul 2003 02:27 UTC

I for one want a processor that doesn't suck up the earth resources. Just think about the quantity of PC out there and that will grow with the population.

Since I read in one of Eugenia's article that MS will break some backward compatability in software, I hope they do this with hardware too. Hopefully .NET has been designed for this purpose.

I would love to have Apple hardware that can run both OS's extremely fast.

Nice article, but why do people complain about OSX unresponsiveness, although I have run a couple of high quality quicktime streams and multitasking was beautiful.