Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 20th Mar 2002 17:08 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Hey Rodrigo, you are the ignorant one. When Altair used the word communist, he was referring to the protest.net link and site, not wil wheaton directly. Protest.net is clearly a left-wing, marxist site, so using communist isn't "narrow-minded". Communism has no single, simple definition. I wouldn't be surprised if I saw an article on protest.net explaining why the Soviet Union wasn't a true form of communism. In short protest.net is ran by marxist scum and wil wheaton is suspect for linking to them. But my guess is that wil wheaton has no coherent ideology, he's just being trendy.