Linked by Nicholas Blachford on Wed 9th Jul 2003 16:43 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



The article is just not very good. How can you take an article seriously when it says something like "the x86 floating point unit is very weak"? Sir, it's quite possible to rig up an x86 CPU with an extremely strong fpu. No one's done it because the consumer market space doesn't need it, and high clockspeeds can disguise it in consumer apps. Don't confuse instruction set with good CPU design.
Another good one: "you can't make a low-power consumption, low-end x86 CPU". Try the C3.
Sorry, but the article is riddled with inaccuracies like those. The ArsTechnica articles BLOW IT AWAY.
-Erwos