Linked by Jeremy T. Fox on Fri 11th Jul 2003 16:55 UTC
A recent article by Tony Smith from The Register titled "Mac OS X 10.3 Panther will not be a 64-bit OS" caused a good deal of confusion with many people, including me. It is also caused a heated argument here on OSNews. The basic point of the article is that Mac OS 10.2.7 and 10.3 are not "true" 64-bit OSes, but the article does not clearly explain what a "true" 64-bit OS is. This had led to a lot of claims that the article is false or misinformed, rather than just unclear, which is certainly is.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Look at the WWDC keynote on http://www.apple.com/quicktime
Watch the Wolfram Research guy talk about Mathematica on the G5.
The interesting part is from 1:43:20 to 1:43:40
He talks of 6GB of accessible memory if I understand that correctly and I'm quite sure that I do. He specifically mentions that the Dual Xeon does NOT support that.
Why would he say that if Panther did only support 2.25GB or 4GB of RAM?