
A recent article by Tony Smith from The Register titled "
Mac OS X 10.3 Panther will not be a 64-bit OS" caused a good deal of confusion with many people, including me. It is also caused a
heated argument here on OSNews. The basic point of the article is that Mac OS 10.2.7 and 10.3 are not "true" 64-bit OSes, but the article does not clearly explain what a "true" 64-bit OS is. This had led to a lot of claims that the article is false or misinformed, rather than just unclear, which is certainly is.
Panther in beta has more eye candy than Jaguar and is dramatically faster than its predecessor. So they're focussing on feature-set expansion and optimization - not one or the other.