Linked by Nicholas Blachford on Wed 9th Jul 2003 16:43 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



>Read my original post: " Microsoft has no plans to >develop a 64-bit DESKTOP OS" (All caps added for >emphasis).
Win2K3 runs DirectX 9 games pretty well...
It’s code base is actually similar i.e. one could transfer some of Win2K3’s .msc applications and run it on WinXP (due to NT 5.x code base).
Win2K3’s is a full Windows XP desktop OS with advance server features. These features can be turned off.
>Everyone knows about the 64-bit Server version
So you think Linux is a desktop OS?
The main difference between Win2K3 (a.k.a NT5.2) and WinXP (a.k.a NT5.1) is it’s Internet related services and the number of usable processors.
>but there is no Windows desktop version!
How could you know this?
Refer to "http://www.betanews.com/article.php3?sid=1048903653" for Windows XP 64bit (for Intel's Itanium 2(IA-64) processor).
Refer to "http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2003/0506/winhec1.htm" (In Japanese) for Windows XP 64bit (AMD's AMD64/X86-64).
Focus on "http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2003/0506/winhec03.jpg". This picture shows a beta version of Windows XP AMD64/X86-64 running UT2003.
Try again...