Linked by Mike Martin on Mon 14th Jul 2003 17:42 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



I've said this before and i'll say it again I respect Linux because i've seen how far it's come and it's capabilities, but it is far from ready for me and most people as an OS to use a decent amount of their time during the day.
I'd have to agree that Linux should go more like Mac OS X. Mac OS X has excellent UNIX core (Darwin) and doesn't get in the way untill you call it. Plus you can do a lot of configuration that linux users would normally do through text files right from a GUI interface.
When i refeer to ease of use i mean ease of use compared to other OS's. For instance Mac OS X probably has the easiest method of installing most apps (just dragging a file/folder from one space to your App folder or wherever). Windows has the next easiest just double clicking on an installer and going through a guided installation process. Linux has the worst installer process of the 3 having to compile the application yourself. I think any Linux user who says this is the only way to do it is a dumbass, most of the world doesn't want to compile things themselves. Doing things this way for Linux is incredibly inefficient and it will never be a mainstream OS as long as people have to do it.
I like Linux but I can't really use it as much as I would like because it's slower than Mac OS X or Windows XP on the hardware I use and it's hard to configure some items and locate apps. I mean on Mac OS X there is a simple Applications folder on Windows a program files folder. How the F*ck on Linux am i supposed to assume that /usr/bin is the Applications folder? Even then I can't find things easily.
Linux take a good long look at Mac OS X because it's what a UNIX based OS should be like. Great UNIX tools with a GUI and a great UNIX core thats you can get at but isn't necessary to even use. Don't get me wrong I like the UNIX terminal but most people don't they simply want to easily install,use and configure their apps the GUI way as opposed to editing a file. Sometimes certain situations call for configuring a file, but thats rare when it can be so much easier from the GUI interface, which is why the GUI was made.