Linked by Thom "Slakje" Holwerda on Fri 25th Jul 2003 19:42 UTC
Editorial To me, it's a miracle how every tiny article on OSNews.com, or any other tech-site, ends up in people shouting all sorts of nonsense at each other like "Linux is gonna bring back Elvis", "Windows shot president Kennedy", "Linux kept the cold war cold" or "Bill Gates wants to buy the moon and charge people for looking at it". Do these people really know what they are saying, or are they just going with the Open-Source flow? Update: Rebuttal article here.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
boot time
by poisti on Fri 25th Jul 2003 21:19 UTC

I use Linux, WindowsXP and MacOSX (used BeOS too). I don't understand what's so important about boot time, it's true, at least for my pc (P4 2.8. SATA RAID0) that WinXP boots much faster than Linux (and MacOSX on my 600MHz iBook) but Linux boots fast enough 30s (after grub was loaded) to not be annoying, win takes about 5s after loading grub. As for hardware support, both WinXP (Home) and SuSE Linux 8.2. (Pro) required me to insert a floppy with the drivers for my SATA RAID controller at the start of the installation. Drivers for WinXP came with the controller, the Linux drivers had to be downloaded from the vendors (Promise) site. The same was the case with drivers for my ATI Radeon 9800Pro.