Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 20th Aug 2003 18:44 UTC, submitted by Kelly Samel
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



By that argument Linux would also be illegal...as would AMD, VIA and transmeta CPUs. Guess what - they're not.
The legal argument is nothing more then FUD (can you say SCO?), they even threatened to sue a year ago - we're still waiting...
However, You seem to misunderstand copyright law.
Even if the AmigaOS structure was copyrighted it can still be legally re-implemented since copyright only applies to the original implementation.
They've gone out and cloned the AmigaOS
No, they've created a different system in a "box" on a different CPU architecture which includes AmigaOS API compatibility, this is quite different from a clone which would be an exact copy.
The lower levels of MorphOS are very different and much more modern in design.
So yes, MorphOS can be sold perfectly legally.