Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 24th Sep 2003 01:45 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Plenty of things to pick on here, but I'll just touch on a couple of points.
A tip: to avoid problems later, select the "full installation," it will save you some headaches along the way.
Really? So you installed it, got into problems because you didn't do a full install, decided to start over and do a full installation and then ignore the part that gave you headaches in the review?
Speed: 8.5/10 (throughput, UI responsiveness, latency)
Uhu. And this is with the vanilla no-preempt no-lowlatency kernel from kernel.org, right?
I find a lot of your writing on this site to be very coloured by how you wish things were, as opposed to how things really are, and this 'review' is a good example.