Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 30th Sep 2003 05:20 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



.. I am wrong ? OK ! Maybe you are wrong as well !
What we need to do is check what we have now and remove stuff (No, not remove even more apps, more prefs and more stuff we loved to use), what I mean is to make libraries faster, remove libraries with only 2 functions is used in the entire Desktop, remove libraries or move functions into other libraries and then remove them. We need to remove libraries where possible. A library that duplicate functions, a library that wraps stuff, a library that only has 2 functions is a pain in the butt. Not that the 2 functions would hurt, no the loading of these libraries do, specially under heavy load.
Has anyone ever made a real life test of GNOME or KDE under heavy load ? E.g. when copying big files across the harddisk. I wish someone would do this and come back talking then. Even when you think that HAL (implemented on the wrong end) is hell fast, then I must tell you that dealing with the library (loading) during heavy load IS NOT fast. It's one of my argumentations besides the others provided by me earlier.