Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 30th Sep 2003 05:20 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



I think there is a misunderstanding about the purpose of this HAL project.
As far as I understood from following the discussion on the mailinglist, HAL is for discovering devices (and device state changes), checking their capabilties and doing simple commands (like locking a CD drive bay, requesting unmount)
Any heavy work will be done directly through appropriate facilities (libraries, direct device access, etc.)
Of course most of it could be implemented at Kernel level and maybe the Linux implementation will do this sometimes.
But one has to define it as an extra layer or one looses portability of DEs to other platforms, like *BSD, commerical Unix, etc.
Nobody at freedesktop.org will sacrifice achievable portability just because some single.platform hack would be a tiny bit faster.