Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 30th Sep 2003 05:20 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Well, if you have something specific, call me on it. However, I really was doing the copy and the compile at the time. Responsiveness didn't suffer, other than the fact that apps took longer to start, which I mentioned. Opening menus, inputing text, scrolling text, moving the mouse, resizing windows, browsing websites, anything that doesn't touch the hard-drive were all fine. Why should it? All of those things are CPU bound, not I/O bound. The compile process fluctuates between 20 and 80% CPU usage, and (like it should) the copy processes takes almost zero CPU. I tried this little experiment again, and this time started glxgears. As expected, I got about 1400 fps, or about half-my usual speed. With glxgears running, the CPU usage is 100%, and stuff like moving and resizing windows starts to lag, but its not noticible unless you go looking for it.
This is a heavily patched 2.4 kernel in Gentoo 1.4 with a 2Ghz P4 and 640MB of RAM. Try it yourself if you don't believe me.