Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 1st Oct 2003 23:09 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



The majority of my machines don't have/use any graphical interface, nor do they have X even installed on the machine. This sounds like a desktop-only process to me.
Not that the existing distros can't be improved to get running faster, but the point is that they can if the user wants that.
I would also suspect that when the work in 2.6 on suspecd is mature, and that's months not years, people who want a fast boot will just suspend to disk and be back up in a few seconds.
All of these make me think that this is a special case solution, not something which will or should be the new standard.