Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 1st Oct 2003 23:09 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Using Mac OS X and Linux daily, I have noticed that the Mac OS X 10.2 SystemStarter is much faster than the Linux init system. SystemStarter builds a dependency tree and then runs everything it can in parallel, starting items dependent on a previous item only if the first item ran correctly. Mac OS X 10.1 ran everything sequentually and at about the speed of the Linux init system.
The Mac OS X SystemStarter is not graphical, it just usally starts graphically if the user wants it, but does not need to do so. No reason this should behave the same way.