Linked by David Adams on Mon 6th Oct 2003 19:34 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Both Windows and Linux are insecure by design. Both are made with the assumption that people in charge of security are perfect. I can't understand why people are so incredibly stupid that they don't realize that security primarily based on ACLs won't work as long as people are infallible. It's not as if people haven't tried that approach, and failed constantly.
So what's the solution then? Well, capability-based security, of course. It works, it works well and the switch could even be made gradually. There is no catch. Only mass ignorance is keeping systems in their current insecure state.