Linked by Roberto J. Dohnert on Mon 6th Oct 2003 01:36 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



FCPro can handle SD, HD or uncompressed 10bit 601 and with Cinema Tools you can work w. film. it depends- hardware matters (of course).
Avid isn't different, they had low-end software-only systems too
They are smiliar, but they are diffrent. FCP was a prosumer NLE retrofitted so it could do high end work with HD, 10 bit, etc. It doesn't a decent job at that.
However, Avid was designed for the highend. Then they made scaled down versions of their apps (the xpress line). Avid is a little higher quality than FCP.
(not very good ones, IMHO).
I disagree, I like XpressDV and Pro better than FCP. FCP is still a good NLE, I just like Avid's better. However, that's really just a matter of personal preference. There isn't much diffrence in quality between the two.
but yes, FCP **IS NOT** hi- end
Yep. But if Apple keeps the pace up with FCP, then it could turn into a true high end app.