Microsoft has a little liability problem called Windows. Many are no doubt aware of a would-be class-action lawsuit launched last week in California. The suit targets Microsoft over security problems. The plaintiff is a woman who had her identity stolen. Details are
here. (NYTimes, free registration required)
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I see your point. And you're right. In fact, the comparison is inaccurate. Because you are effectively responsible for your own security, so if a thief breaks in your house, which has not been secured, you can't sue the proprietor (he has no obligation and you have agreed to rent the house, as is), but if the house explodes because of bad plumbing, you are entitled to sue the landlord (he is responsible for concealed flaws, even if he is not aware).
Interesting case. I wonder who is going to be held responsible.
Now I can say that I would accept the complaint, and that I am glad not to be the judge.
I see your point. And you're right. In fact, the comparison is inaccurate. Because you are effectively responsible for your own security, so if a thief breaks in your house, which has not been secured, you can't sue the proprietor (he has no obligation and you have agreed to rent the house, as is), but if the house explodes because of bad plumbing, you are entitled to sue the landlord (he is responsible for concealed flaws, even if he is not aware).
Interesting case. I wonder who is going to be held responsible.
Now I can say that I would accept the complaint, and that I am glad not to be the judge.