Microsoft has a little liability problem called Windows. Many are no doubt aware of a would-be class-action lawsuit launched last week in California. The suit targets Microsoft over security problems. The plaintiff is a woman who had her identity stolen. Details are
here. (NYTimes, free registration required)
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
MS always markets 'ease of use' and 'freedom' and pretends that problems don't exist.
In Australia there is a legal term 'of merchantable quality' which means a product is of sufficient quality for its intended use. That means a cheap T shirt won't fall apart the first time you wear it or a car won't constantly break down.
EULAs work because most politicians are technically illiterate. They can understand that a car needs to be reliable and safe. They don't understand that software needs to be reliable too.
MS markets its products as simple and totally reliable. I have never seen an MS advertisement warning of the dangers of malware.
Perhaps Ralph Nader should start a software campaign "Unsafe at any MHz".
MS always markets 'ease of use' and 'freedom' and pretends that problems don't exist.
In Australia there is a legal term 'of merchantable quality' which means a product is of sufficient quality for its intended use. That means a cheap T shirt won't fall apart the first time you wear it or a car won't constantly break down.
EULAs work because most politicians are technically illiterate. They can understand that a car needs to be reliable and safe. They don't understand that software needs to be reliable too.
MS markets its products as simple and totally reliable. I have never seen an MS advertisement warning of the dangers of malware.
Perhaps Ralph Nader should start a software campaign "Unsafe at any MHz".
This applies to most other makers not just MS.