Linked by Jason Parker on Mon 20th Oct 2003 18:01 UTC
Fedora Test 3, is, most certainly, as the name says, a test. In my experience there are a few problems and a few bugs that would keep me from recommending it as an everyday desktop replacement, but nonetheless, Fedora is an Operating System (distro) worth watching out.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Any distro that doesn't have a serious package manager will not get a thumbs up from me, simple. Because that's the only feature that seperates linux distros. And that's why I consider 97% of Linux distros as silly and plain nonsensical. Fedora at present fall into that category.
I apologize I may sound a little repugnant, but I hope you understand my perspective. Give me a call when any distro beats portage(currently the best feature rich package manager) robustness (6000 packages) and debian apts(haven't used it in a while, I'm sure it's improving) QA and security (10000 pacakges). Mind you both gentoo's portage and debian's apt suck. They only suck less than anything I've seen resembling a package management system. Which is really sad.
LSB is also silly for adopting RPMs as it's package manager standard. I'll give Red Hat/Fedora one thing though, they are relatively painless to install. My hat's up for that and nothing else.
Any distro that doesn't have a serious package manager will not get a thumbs up from me, simple. Because that's the only feature that seperates linux distros. And that's why I consider 97% of Linux distros as silly and plain nonsensical. Fedora at present fall into that category.
I apologize I may sound a little repugnant, but I hope you understand my perspective. Give me a call when any distro beats portage(currently the best feature rich package manager) robustness (6000 packages) and debian apts(haven't used it in a while, I'm sure it's improving) QA and security (10000 pacakges). Mind you both gentoo's portage and debian's apt suck. They only suck less than anything I've seen resembling a package management system. Which is really sad.
LSB is also silly for adopting RPMs as it's package manager standard. I'll give Red Hat/Fedora one thing though, they are relatively painless to install. My hat's up for that and nothing else.