Linked by Mo Mckinlay on Fri 31st Oct 2003 17:35 UTC
There's been much discussion over the past few months about the marriage of databases and filesystems - with Microsoft's Longhorn reportedly sporting the
Yukon integrated SQL Server, and GNOME Storage in heaty debate, if not development, there's been lots to talk about.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
What I've not seen mentioned is the fact that the operating system exists on top of a virtual machine which includes DB2. The virtual machine was a 256-bit architecture when the System/38 and AS/400 hardware was 48-bit and the rest of the world was 16 and 32-bit. The hardware has changed several times since 1979 but compiled applications rarely need to be re-compiled to run.
The file system is more complicated. There is a root level system which was introduced several years ago which contains the database file system, the document file system, a UNIX-compatible file system, and any user-installed file systems.
As far as applying the database system to work on another operating system, it wouldn't be easy because it's not just a file system.
What I've not seen mentioned is the fact that the operating system exists on top of a virtual machine which includes DB2. The virtual machine was a 256-bit architecture when the System/38 and AS/400 hardware was 48-bit and the rest of the world was 16 and 32-bit. The hardware has changed several times since 1979 but compiled applications rarely need to be re-compiled to run.
The file system is more complicated. There is a root level system which was introduced several years ago which contains the database file system, the document file system, a UNIX-compatible file system, and any user-installed file systems.
As far as applying the database system to work on another operating system, it wouldn't be easy because it's not just a file system.