Linked by Michael L. Love on Mon 3rd Nov 2003 19:19 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



#1: I think that the GNU zealots do not like BSD type licenses as modifiers of BSD licensed code are NOT required to share their source code and changes. Any other problems here are ancillary, I believe.
#2: go look on macslash re. earlier articles about this project and responses from their so called leader. The guy is one of the most rabid zealots that I have ever seen and/or heard of.
#3: Overall, it should be no worse off than any other Linux or *BSD distro, but I really doubt that there is anything extraordinarily technologically compelling about it. It may make a nice little benchmark project for someone to benchmark *BSD, couple of linux distros, OSX, Solaris, and GNU/Darwin...