Linked by David Adams on Mon 15th Oct 2001 02:23 UTC
Mac OS X OS News' review of Mac OS X last week certainly stirred up controversy, partially because some die hard Mac fans perceived that it was improper for an outsider (someone who is not an everyday Mac user) to me making broad criticisms after only a superficial introduction to the New operating system. Well, folks, that's why they call it a review. We thought that Apple's major new OS also deserved a road test, and there were two very important events in Mac OS X history just a few days ago that toppled the last major obstacle to making it ready for millions of Mac users to start using it as their everyday OS: the 10.1 release and the release of Microsoft Office X. Last week, I made the switch and started using Mac OS X as my everyday OS. Here's how it went:
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Roundtable: Does Apple Matter?
by Pahtz on Mon 15th Oct 2001 11:12 UTC

A couple of months ago there was a roundtable discussion on the "Does Apple Matter?" issue. http://www.siliconvalley.com/roundtable/ Perhaps of interest is the guest list which includes Gil Amelio, Jean-Louis Gassee and Jeff Raskin. It might be of interest to some people to read JLG's comments which were made around the time Palm announced it was to purchase the technological assets of Be Inc. Although he was speaking about Apple, it offers a glimpse of the thinking behind Be's focus shift from a desktop OS that was gaining traction and generating increasing revenue, to a gamble on IA's in a market that had yet to materialize. (Hint: look for the bit where he describes the shift from Apple ]['s to Mac's.) But back to Apple, after praising the risky move from Apple 2's to Mac's, Apple is criticised for playing it safe ever since... I'll let y'all read it yourself... it ties in with the Microsoft Office focus of the OSNews article.