Linked by Corey Holcomb-Hockin on Wed 5th Nov 2003 19:48 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



I'm also blown away by the author of the article using the FreeBSD 2.x method of kernel configuration+building. This hasn't been the recommended method for years upon years now. Read /usr/src/Makefile for details.
I prefer the old method personally, and I've seen no technical reason not to use it. It's quite convenient if you only check out the src-sys tree via CVSup (thus the toplevel Makefile won't be present), with the plan of a binary upgrade to bring the system to the next release. I admit the article could teach a bit more pertainent practices, or at least show both, but there's no technical reason to be critical of this method, at least that I'm aware of.