Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 7th May 2002 15:21 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 21:46 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



GCC is the Gnu Compiler Collection. It aims to be portable and support a lot of targets. The questions basically reeked of "gcc produces inferior x86-code. What are you doing to fix this for us non-contributing leeches?", which is just plain rude and whining.
The questions should have been about general improvements in code generation, if the codebase has become easier work with and add targets to, if any new targets is coming in, how much of the c++ standard it supports (is export in? g++ compiles both Loki and Boost, no? Does MSVC?). You didn't even ask what was in store after the release? What is the focus of the next major version?
In short, the questions sucked and the answers were to the point.