Linked by Rayiner Hashem & Eugenia Loli-Queru on Mon 24th Nov 2003 16:24 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



I am really getting tired of people bitching about linux software installation.
The average windows users have a way of messing up their win* installation by installing/uninstalling a bunch of crap. More than half of these softwares never really get uninstalled, and Win* uninstallers most of time leaves files and entries about the software in the registry.
With that said I am sure rpm/deb could be improved on:
Standardize labeling, versioning and dependency conventions for software. Some packagers label, organize, and place varied dependencies for the exact same piece of softwares they package.
Check out freshrpms, atrpms, and ximian to name a few.
1. We could adopt java packages name space convention to solve this problem.
org.gnome.* or org.kde.*
The label version and dependency (internal) must come
from the developers/organization that create/provide the softwares.
Lets solve the real problem here!!
no standards.