Linked by Barry Smith on Wed 26th Nov 2003 18:11 UTC
It seems to me that a lot of attention lately in the commercial Linux development area has concentrated on either large enterprise customers, or wooing the home user who can barely turn a computer on. Even distros claiming to offer the perfect solution for both ends of the spectrum don't quite seem to fit what I am looking for.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Your scoring system is wide open to misuse. You can grade any distro to any score this way.
Let's see: redhat 5.1:
didn't recognize my hard disk geometry correctly: -2 (I really hated that)
- didn't have some apps that RH 4.2 did: -1
Where's Metro-x? -1 ... so, we're at -4 right now.
Nothing really new, as far as I can see: 0
Installer isn't graphical, even though my friend Eugene said it is: -1
Your scoring system is wide open to misuse. You can grade any distro to any score this way.
Let's see: redhat 5.1:
didn't recognize my hard disk geometry correctly: -2 (I really hated that)
- didn't have some apps that RH 4.2 did: -1
Where's Metro-x? -1 ... so, we're at -4 right now.
Nothing really new, as far as I can see: 0
Installer isn't graphical, even though my friend Eugene said it is: -1
So, we get -5
This is bovine.