Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 6th Dec 2003 19:42 UTC, submitted by Tom Curtis
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



<< One can say this is to support their UNIX Service programs, but consider that the package has been around for awhile. Are you telling me that a huge company like MS is just no figuring out that there may be IP issues with the product? That until now, they've been illegally distributing SCO's IP? >>
Did you go to PDC? Have you seen the new Services for UNIX 3.5? Probably not, until you do then you couldnt possibly understand. Until I see real proof that Microsoft is funding SCO then I will take it as vaporware and ramblings of crackpot zealots. I used to think it but then I started looking at all reality. There is no proof MS is funding SCO, absolutely none most of what everyone is doing is reading into a Licensing agreement between two companies if it wasnt Microsoft and SCO, no one would think anything about it.