Linked by Matt Brewer on Fri 12th Dec 2003 20:43 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Lack of competition is never a good reason to use anything. I'm not bashing Microsoft but what you are talking about is an obvious monopoly. That isn't good for prices or innovation. And I wouldn't say IE is the best browser. My personal favorite is Firebird, but the fact that MS is emulating the alternative browsers with integrated pop-up blocking, download manager, and other things, proves that they AREN'T the best. Maybe they will be in some day, but the fact that they have to put these features into future versions of IE while the alternatives have them already shows that they are playing catch-up, and are actually inferior. It's just a pain to go and download something else and install it, then have to deal with changing it to your default, etc. etc. that most people stay with IE.