Linked by Matt Brewer on Fri 12th Dec 2003 20:43 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Few care about "standards compliant" xhtm/css. When 97% following the same rule, it is called "de facto" standards.
Yep. "De facto" translates to "moving target." Right before IE 6 hit the market the line was "IE is the standard," but then suddenly sites that conformed to the "standard" broke.
It is going to happen again. Something important is going to be fixed to work the way the w3c's standard says it should, and web developers are going to pressure users to IE 7, which in this case is going to mean Windows YP.
As a designer I have a few BIG problems with IE. I guess I can look forward to having one of them fixed. I bet it will support transparent png's.
Still, has anyone noticed and differences in rendering in this version of IE? I think that is what I was really going ask in this post.