Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 13th Dec 2003 08:45 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



I don't care the slightest whether this is something new or not (please just get over it once and for all), I was just refering to your complaint about it beeing "slow, unreliable, and unsafe. And it doesn't do you a lot of good when you are 40,000 feet over the middle of the Atlantic Ocean on a business trip". If you'd read the article you'd know that the application is not run from the network at all, it's run from the cache and only downloaded from the network if it's missing. Thus, it could probably be better described as "installing on the fly".
Sorry for my initial harsh words, but it really bugs me when people take the time to write complaints, before they actually take the time to carefully read what it's about.