Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 31st Dec 2003 18:41 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Yes, I've used Windows 2003, but it doesn't scale like Solaris, nor remain as stable over time. It's certainly nowhere as mature in its drivers and modular architecture either. And it lacks a lot of the secondary support structures that are easily bolted onto Linux.
As an out-of-the-box solution for a homogenous network it is okay, but not as powerful as the other two when it comes to more "real world" heterogenous setups.