Linked by Walter Kruse on Thu 8th Jan 2004 06:55 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



"4 GB HD space is worth less than $4.. so why should you care?"
That's a very Microsoft-esque way of thinking. Our goal should be to create an OS that's efficient and uses disk space appropriately, rather than just eating up room because it's there. Elegance, efficiency and cleanliness are important, and trying to keep a system's footprint down leads to a better end result than just throwing in anything possible.
Developers who care about overhead and size usually create the cleanest and most efficient software. Those who assume everyone won't mind filling their 80G drive with redundant files usually end up with bloated and bug-ridden apps.