Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 12th Jan 2004 05:21 UTC, submitted by Simon Strandgaard
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Steve, two points:
1) When you want to develop an OS, you either do it all on your own, or you try to convince lots of over-hyped GPL groupies that there's something that cannot be done in Linux. Both near to impossible. Or you create a company and pay developers to do the job. A company has to sell something. Now, you can either make your OS Open Source but so hard to understand and handle that you can sell manuals, precompiled distributions and nifty installers - or you make your OS simple to use and *charge* for your product. That's called "free market"...
2) Most if not all of the stuff in that Wiki is about *design* questions. Design is not done in code, and in plain sight for anyone capable to see even if the code is proprietary. If anything, complain about patents that disallow being inspired by a design...