Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 12th Jan 2004 05:21 UTC, submitted by Simon Strandgaard
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



"Too bad the IT world is filled with people who practice the "Not Invented Here" syndrome. Microsoft had a perfectly good UNIX and all they needed was to bolt a nice GUI onto it. Had they done that we would have had a rock solid operating system by 1995 but instead they re-invented the wheel in the form of Windows NT"
Indeed. Xenix on a RS Model 16 with a winchester drive.
Windows NT pre 4.0 was actually decent. There might have been other issues that kept MS from the Unix space, other than NIH.
"Linux has the same syndrome, we had a perfectly good toolkit, qt, however, then we had the merry band of NIH merchants claiming the creation of GTK was necessarily for the "protection and promotion" of "freedom". "
We also had GNUStep. Were's the "holy wars" and conspiracy theories there? Waaa, not fair that QT and GTK have all the fun. Anyway GTK was originally created for the GIMP, NOT for any "P & P of freedom" war between QT and GTK.