Linked by Tony Bourke on Wed 21st Jan 2004 02:41 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



The Ultra_60 had *two* UPA graphics slots (as opposed to one
in the Ultra_10 and zero in the Ultra_5).
I think the Ultra_80 may have had more than two (or was it up to 4 CPUs and 2 UPA slots?)
And, somewhat similar to the Ultra_5 versus Ultra_10 difference: the Ultra_1E had wide SCSI, hme (fast Ethernet) and the Creator3D graphics
i.e. UPA graphics board, versus the Ultra_1 which had only narrow SCSI, le (10 Mbps Ethernet) and the lower graphics
(but you could add a single SBus card to the Ultra_1 which
would give it wide SCSI and hme i.e. fast Ethernet;) Larry.