Linked by Andrew Barilla on Tue 10th Feb 2004 20:08 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



There are ALWAYS debian fans here claiming unstable is stable. Well, it's NOT. I've ran it twice in my life. Once around 4 years ago, and once last year. Both times I had numerous show stopping bugs and package dependancy problems.
I've even had a freind of mine who loves debian to death told me not to use unstable because "it's unstable". Please stop misleading people. It doesn't help debian any.
The fact that so many people claim debian unstable is in fact unstable, even the debian developers, should tell you that maybe you are in the minority if it works for you!