Linked by Andrew Barilla on Tue 10th Feb 2004 20:08 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



I'm using Fedora Core 1 since its release, and I'm totally satisfied with it.

I didn't test yum, because since RedHat 7.3 I used to use apt4rpm. And I think apt is a great tool ! I know that in Free Sofwares, there's a place for everyone. So why not another packages manager... But reinventing the wheel may be a loss of time, don't you think ?
So, what are the pros for pacman ? Is apt not enough efficient ?
By the way, I'll give a try to Arch, because I've heard of it 2 years ago and it seemed already very interesting.
PS : sorry for my english, you know, I'm just a froggy