Linked by Andrew Barilla on Tue 10th Feb 2004 20:08 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Use WinXP/OSX for desktop and Free/Open/NetBSD for servers. Currently thats what each works best at. In the future if they become better at other/different roles I will use them according to their strengths. I've shuffled linunx distros countless times and realize that they just aren't up to par if you actually want to get stuff done productively. If linux doesn't get organized soon it will become just another toy o/s that people with too much time on their hands hack around in!
Sure. Tell that to IBM, SGI, Oracle, and others. Maybe some of those companies might actually use FreeBSD on their servers if it could scale at all.